Monitoring Reports on Kukdong

Articles and Other Documents on Kukdong
Monitoring Agencies and NGOs
Since the workers of the Kukdong apparel factory (now called "Mexmode") in Atlixco, Mexico went on strike in January of 2001, the site has become the focus of international scrutiny and has served as a test case for international labor rights enforcement. The plant was the target of massive student protest in the US in support of worker demands, several large-scale investigations by apparel factory monitoring agencies, and an unprecedented intervention by brand name manufacturers that outsource to the factory. Two years later, the situation in Kukdong has improved dramatically. Workers have been able to establish the first indendent union for garment workers in Mexico that holds a collective bargaining agreement and wages have risen more than 40%.

Kukdong: A Case of Effective Labor Standards Enforcement

By Jeremy Blasi
Henning Center for International Labor Relations
UC Berkeley

On January 9 of 2001, the workers of Kukdong International (now called "Mexmode"), an apparel contractor in the town of Atlixco, Mexico, seized control of their factory. Fed up with the factory's rancid cafeteria food, corrupt company-allied union, and the firing of five workers for demanding better treatment, approximately 800 workers, mostly young women in their teens and early 20s, left their stations at midday and went on wildcat strike. For the next three days, they camped in protest in factory's front patio, enduring nights of drizzling rain with little or no cover. Late on the third night, a battalion of riot police, led by the existing union's secretary general, marched into the area wielding clubs and guns. By sunrise, 17 workers needed medical attention. Several were struck unconscious.

This is, of course, not an uncommon story in Mexico. In fact, many of Kukdong's workers were joined in protest by parents and relatives who themselves had gone on strike and been attacked just months before in the neighboring city of Matamoros. Nor is it unusual in Mexico for government backed "unions" to sign sweetheart protection contracts with employers, as was the case at Kukdong, that ensure for the union a constant influx of dues while obstructing genuine organizing - the vast majority of Mexico's maquiladora workers suffer from this kind of representation.

What was unusual about Kukdong was the tremendous outpouring of international support, primarily from American students, that the strike generated. News of the uprising and violent dispersal, and the fact that Kukdong was a major producer for Nike and dozens of universities, zipped quickly through the internet to student anti-sweatshop activists in the US. Spying another bout with the mammoth apparel firm, students organized support rallies at Nike stores across the country. Meanwhile, a wave of new factory monitoring organizations descended on Atlixco to conduct investigations. Within weeks the story had made it to the pages of the New York Times. By late February the factory had reinstated the majority of the fired workers, including several of the leaders originally terminated for organizing - a virtually unprecedented scenario in Mexican maquiladoras. And by mid September, the workers of Kukdong had successfully launched the only independent union for garment workers in all of Mexico with a collective bargaining agreement. They have since won improvements in almost every aspect of factory life.

The surprising turn of events might not have been possible just several years ago. In the past three years, students at nearly 200 universities have launched "sweat free campus" campaigns, demanding that their administrations adopt anti-sweatshop policies for their schools' licensed products. Many of these policies included a provision requiring that licensees publicly disclose the names and locations of the contractors they hire to make their products. Before the policies were enacted it was virtually impossible for a concerned citizen or researcher to identify the factory where a particular garment was made - such information was concealed by companies as a trade secret. But in the Spring of 2000, after refusing for years, companies began to post lists of factory addresses on the internet. Kukdong was on a list disclosed by Nike. A student researcher, wielding this information, happened to be in the area when the Kukdong workers went on strike. He relayed the story to the student activist community in the U.S. and the campaign took off from there. Without the university policies, Kukdong might have faded, like so many other worker uprisings, into obscurity.

Another crucial development was the emergence of a crop of agencies designed to inspect garment factories against anti-sweatshop policies. Several of these organizations, the Worker Rights Consortium, Verite, and the International Labor Rights Fund, traveled to Atlixco shortly after the strike to investigate alleged abuses. Their findings, circulated widely among university and apparel industry personnel and the media, verified the workers' claims of rancid food, physical abuse, and sub-poverty wages, and helped move Nike and other licensees to intervene. Much debate has recently arisen over what role U.S. based garment factory monitoring agencies can and should play. Kukdong has shown clearly that one of these roles can be supporting worker organizing.

Of course, this sort of international support can easily fall into paternalism or irrelevance without a genuine alliance with workers inside the plant. In this case, the workers themselves spearheaded the campaign and established a remarkably strong base of support. The conditions for organizing are daunting. The factory's workforce lives scattered across 64 small rural towns surrounding the factory, some located as far as two hours away. Most workers cannot be reached by phone, so to keep workers informed one has to drive deep into rural areas and simply hope the workers will be around when you arrive. There is always a threat of violence from the CROC union and their "gulpeodores" (literally "hitters"). In the months following the strike, one worker-leader was stalked and threatened in her home and another was attacked in front of the factory. In addition to all this, the workers have had to contend with a local government with long historical ties to the CROC. The local election board, for instance, blocked the union's bid for formal recognition for two months based on obscure technicalities. Yet, despite these obstacles, the workers of Kukdong managed to build overwhelming support for an independent union among the factory's workers - so much so that in September of 2001 the Kukdong management voluntarily revoked its previous contract with the CROC and granted workers the right to form their own independent union and negotiate a contract. The workers are now in their second contract with the company and have won raises of more than 40%.

Beyond a historic victory in one of Mexico's 3,400 foreign-owned assembly plants, Kukdong may represent the first successful implementation of a new model for achieving basic labor rights on an international level. In the new era of globalization, the need for such universally observed rights has never been greater. But global governance institutions, like the United Nations and World Trade Organization, have either lacked sufficient enforcement mechanisms or declined to include labor standards at all. In the absence of such formal agreements, first world activists have chosen to bypass government and international organizations and call directly upon transnational corporations to adopt socially responsible business practices. Corporate and university anti-sweatshop policies are one result of these campaigns. But until now, consumer-based anti-sweatshop projects have generally not been connected to the workers themselves so their policies have not been available to workers as tools to change the power relations in which they work and live. The Kukdong struggle represents a crucial transcending of scales between third and first world activists.

Until labor rights are enacted meaningfully on a global level, this sort of alliance may be the most promising model internationally-minded activists have for challenging unregulated global business practices.




Reports on Kukdong


The Worker Rights Consortium
Preliminary Report
Informe Preliminar (In Spanish)
Second Report
Informe Segundo (In Spanish)

International Labor Rights Fund
Report by Arturo Alcalde Justiniani

Verite
Report commissioned by Nike


Articles and Other documents on Kukdong


Mexican Labor Protest Gets Results
By Ginger Thompson
New York Times
Wednesday, October 3, 2001

Business as usual - Mexico's president ignores old-style labor repression
By Wendy Patterson
San Francisco Chronicle
Thursday, July 19, 2001

La Lucha Sigue: Stories from the People of the Kukdong Factory
Centro de Apoyo al Trajador
Collegiate Apparel Research Initiative - Mexico
July 2001


Monitoring Agencies and Advocacy Groups

Worker Rights Consortium
International Labor Rights Fund
Fair Labor Association
United Students Against Sweatshops

Sweatshop Watch


     




CLRE >>  HENNING CENTER HOME  l  EVENTS  l  INTERNET RESOURCE GATEWAY  l  RESEARCH PROJECTS  l  CONTACT US


  IIR HOME
  LIBRARY
  PROGRAMS
  SITEMAP
  SEARCH
 
Copyright © 2004 Institute of Industrial Relations. 
2521 Channing Way # 5555 
University of California, Berkeley 94720 
Direct comments about this site to: 
web administrator